Christians accept Îsâ ‘alaihis-salâm’ as [Allah forbid] God, and the Apostles and Paul as a Prophet each. They accept the epistles and letters written by them as heavenly books and epistles revealed through wahy (revelation). Therefore, these epistles come right after the four Gospels in the New Testament of the Holy Bible.
A close look at these epistles will show that, though the epistles are said to be the complementaries and supplementaries of the four Gospels, there are so many inconsistencies within themselves and so many contradictions between them and the four Gospels that an attempt to explain them one by one would end up in huge volumes of books larger than the Holy Bible itself.
Here are some examples:
Rahmatullah Efendi’s account of the event of Paul’s conversion in his book Iz-hâr-ul-haqq is as follows:
There are many paradoxes on how Paul believed in the ninth, twenty-second and twenty-third chapters of the Book of Acts (of the Apostles). I explained them in ten paragraphs in my book titled Izâlat-ush-shuqâq. But in this book of mine I shall mention only three of them:
- — In the seventh verse of the ninth chapter of the Book of Acts (of the Apostles): “And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.” (Acts: 9-7) In the ninth verse of the twenty-second chapter, on the other hand: “And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.” (ibid: 22-9)
And in the twenty-sixth chapter the question whether the voice was heard or not is passed over without any mention. The opposition between these three expressions is apparent.
2 — In the sixth verse of the ninth chapter of the same book: =>
To read more about this topic, please proceed to download the book below;
RELATED BOOK ONLINE: COULD NOT ANSWER
CHAPTER : AN OBSERVATION OF THE EPISTLES
PAGE : 93 – 96
